Confirmed! Global warming is ‘settled’ as a scam- www.wnd.com www.kusi.com An Inconvenient Truth The brouhaha over the recent epiphany regarding junk science and climate change duplicity is a big deal. Science is supposed to be all about facts, evidence and proof. The scientific method that kids are taught at an early age is explained as A method of discovering knowledge about the natural world based in making falsifiable predictions (hypotheses), testing them empirically, and developing peer-reviewed theories that best explain the known data. It is not supposed to be….. www.newswithviews.com by Geoff Metcalf An epic debate is underway in our country. Proposed climate legislation would have a far-reaching impact on our standard of living and give government a portal into every aspect of our lives. The affordable, dependable and abundant energy upon which any great civilization is built is about to be rationed. Because of the atmosphere of national and global panic, facts and the possible disastrous effects get overlooked in the irrational rush to pass climate legislation. Climate Chains is our effort to petition a reasoned and rational approach to the climate change policy debate. We invite you to challenge your world view on our nations climate policy. We invite you to view www.climatechains.com Join http www.resistnet.com Climate Change Treaty A Precursor To Global Government? It appears that what a US President and Congress (Republican or Democratic) could not do …
One of the most interesting and alarming videos I have watched.
Comment by TWH970 — July 16, 2010 @ 11:52 pm
Best line of the video: “If you want to know who’s going to get rich off this [cap and trade] bill, just look at who’s lobbying for it.” If you think politicians are more concerned about the environment than about their wallets, you’re seriously gullible.
Comment by ElaineEC — July 17, 2010 @ 12:37 am
Best line of the video: “If you want to know who’s going to get rich off this [cap and trade] bill, just look at who’s lobbying for it.” If you think politicians are more concerned about the environment than about their wallets, you’re seriously gullible.
Comment by ElaineEC — July 17, 2010 @ 1:20 am
Best line of the video: “If you want to know who’s going to get rich off this [cap and trade] bill, just look at who’s lobbying for it.” If you think politicians are more concerned about the environment than about their wallets, you’re seriously gullible.
Comment by ElaineEC — July 17, 2010 @ 1:42 am
It Pays to Go Green. Al Gores Net Worth Jumps From $2 Million in 2000 to $100 Million in 2008
Comment by ElaineEC — July 17, 2010 @ 1:52 am
Global temperature and global CO2 in the atmosphere are both at a 250 million year low. Sea levels drop when the globe warms because of isostasy. Global warming is a good thing because the Earth is too cold.
Comment by taylorgrey2004 — July 17, 2010 @ 2:26 am
Which temperature stats are those?
Comment by Richard482 — July 17, 2010 @ 2:38 am
A wholly biased and irresponsible video.
Comment by Herecomesthefatlady — July 17, 2010 @ 3:34 am
Agreed Global Warming Scare is rather in-direct and suspect. USA’s individuals need space to step it up and actually make new stuff.
Disagree: status quo per capitas for high energy consumption and low exports is not supportable. Exclusively supporting big business or big gov is not a balanced view. Status quo needs to be stirred.
Comment by timeorspace — July 17, 2010 @ 3:51 am
Never believe a mainstream political class celebrity like Al Gore. They get wealthy from lying for the special interest groups.
Comment by sinclair61 — July 17, 2010 @ 4:28 am
Want to see who is, in part, hiding behind these curtains?
Please, see my page’s featured video and comments section for critical, newly published expose on CAIR.
Comment by JPK7777777 — July 17, 2010 @ 4:55 am
I think the present very firm stance taken by the more powerful developing countries not to cower under this euphoria is healthy and will create a rethink. China and India are not only emergent but they are wise and mature nations with an ancient mental. They know they have been used badly before they will not cave in to the rhetoric when it comes to signing on the dotted line. The Copenhagen sumit threw up all the hidden agendas. They are now even more resistant. Great Video
Comment by gonedoolali — July 17, 2010 @ 5:30 am
Firstly Al gore isn’t the man leading the C02 ennicitive. I never knew there was even a debate till recently, but i think people need to study what scientists say on both sides. Because to be honest, the science of global warming isn’t easy, and people can be easily influenced either way because they dont fully understandthescience. I’m studying this topic heavily, but pleasedon’t listen to these propoganda videosthey dont help. If you want to have a say study th science and then make a decision
Comment by dnbsoldier20 — July 17, 2010 @ 6:06 am
see orgonite for global refreshing!
Comment by evenesteven — July 17, 2010 @ 6:13 am
these global warming idiots are brainwashed and will never see outside al gore’s box. they’re scared little people who need to belong. they found their place in this green religion and won’t ever see it any other way. the sky is always falling. it makes me laugh at the gullibility of humans.
Comment by fieldzee09 — July 17, 2010 @ 6:33 am
As serious as CANCER! That is what I view the NWO as. Cancer, slowly eating away at our civil liberties, rights, and just about everyfucking thing else!
Comment by Malachi1979 — July 17, 2010 @ 7:22 am
Al Gore is just as much New World Order SCUM as the rest of them!
Comment by Malachi1979 — July 17, 2010 @ 8:13 am
You’re v naive if you believe the attendees at Bilderberg(er) meetings represent themselves personally, and not the banks, corporations, etc. they represent in everyday life. Are you aware of the attendee overlap between Bilderberg and Trilateral Commission and CFR? Do you really believe these groups have NO bearing on policy? Even though current policy worldwide matches their stated goal of a one world state?
Tell me, what is this New World Order we hear Gordon Brown, Obama, et al mention?
Comment by jovovichnik — July 17, 2010 @ 8:16 am
@jovovichnik: They are a sliver because there’s barely over 100 people at their meetings. Look, you’re the one making the remarkable claim that these people control the world. You show us how. Show us the guest list and their combined net worth. Show us clear examples of this group affecting specific decisions by governmental bodies.
It’s not enough to just say they’re rich, powerful, secretive and have political opinions, therefore they rule the world.
Comment by Daytimeofnight — July 17, 2010 @ 8:56 am
Thank you! People who don’t study these matters find them absurd and dismiss them as “conspiracy theories”. But these matters aren’t conjecture or paranoia when research shows they are deadly serious, cast-iron facts.
Comment by jovovichnik — July 17, 2010 @ 9:16 am
On what basis can you say they represent a tiny sliver of wealth or influence? Central bankers, royalty, mega corporations… These people own the vast majority of the earth’s wealth. The round tables and think tanks they fund are at the cutting edge of policy formation in all major and most minor western nations, which is why key government policies in western nations are eerily identical and why leaders everywhere are pursuing an in-your-face globalist agenda. Look into this and reconsider!
Comment by jovovichnik — July 17, 2010 @ 9:49 am
Climate change? See: HAARP
Comment by Malachi1979 — July 17, 2010 @ 10:47 am
Glad to read that somebody actually knows what they’re talking about.
Comment by Malachi1979 — July 17, 2010 @ 10:51 am
FUCK the New World Order!
Comment by Malachi1979 — July 17, 2010 @ 11:17 am
Perhaps it comes as a surprise to you, but yes, rich folk like to talk politics.
Do you honestly think that the Bilderberg clan represent the majority of the world’s wealth? They’re a tiny sliver. A handful of wealthy people may be able to influence a few policy makers with big donations, but the idea that they “own governments” etc, etc. is just conspiracy-think.
It’s just an excuse so that you can dismiss evidence you don’t like (climate change) by saying it’s part of a conspiracy. Convenient.
Comment by Daytimeofnight — July 17, 2010 @ 11:43 am